<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 236 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72305</link>
    <description>Hydrogen used with oxygen as a fuel to melt quartz burners was disputed as a &quot;raw material&quot; for exemption under Notification No. 201/79. The Assistant Collector and Collector (Appeals) treated the gases as inputs that assist manufacturing rather than raw materials; the Tribunal likewise held that hydrogen used as a source of heat cannot be treated as a raw material for the notification. Finding a question of law, the Tribunal referred to the High Court under section 35G the question whether such use of hydrogen qualifies as a raw material within the meaning of the notification. No substantive decision on the merits was recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 13:18:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 236 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72305</link>
      <description>Hydrogen used with oxygen as a fuel to melt quartz burners was disputed as a &quot;raw material&quot; for exemption under Notification No. 201/79. The Assistant Collector and Collector (Appeals) treated the gases as inputs that assist manufacturing rather than raw materials; the Tribunal likewise held that hydrogen used as a source of heat cannot be treated as a raw material for the notification. Finding a question of law, the Tribunal referred to the High Court under section 35G the question whether such use of hydrogen qualifies as a raw material within the meaning of the notification. No substantive decision on the merits was recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>