<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (6) TMI 131 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72287</link>
    <description>A public notice issued after an import licence cannot retrospectively alter rights created by that earlier licence unless retrospective effect is expressly provided. The licence in question was governed by the policy conditions and amendments in force up to its date of issue, so the later public notice could not invalidate imports already authorised under it. The relevant handbook provisions and shipment-related dates were examined against this principle, and the earlier Supreme Court approach was followed. The finding that the import was unauthorised on the basis of the later notice was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 12:11:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (6) TMI 131 - CEGAT, BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72287</link>
      <description>A public notice issued after an import licence cannot retrospectively alter rights created by that earlier licence unless retrospective effect is expressly provided. The licence in question was governed by the policy conditions and amendments in force up to its date of issue, so the later public notice could not invalidate imports already authorised under it. The relevant handbook provisions and shipment-related dates were examined against this principle, and the earlier Supreme Court approach was followed. The finding that the import was unauthorised on the basis of the later notice was therefore set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>