<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 223 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72282</link>
    <description>Exporters must disclose the value, sort, specification, quality and description of goods in shipping documents under the export control and foreign exchange regime. Where those particulars are not properly stated and the consignment is graded and priced by measurable characteristics, undervaluation may be proved through market enquiries, comparable export prices, local market prices, expert opinion and departmental valuation. On the record, the exporter did not effectively challenge that evidence or seek cross-examination, and the surrounding circumstances supported mens rea. Misdeclaration and undervaluation were therefore established, and confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 11:39:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 223 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72282</link>
      <description>Exporters must disclose the value, sort, specification, quality and description of goods in shipping documents under the export control and foreign exchange regime. Where those particulars are not properly stated and the consignment is graded and priced by measurable characteristics, undervaluation may be proved through market enquiries, comparable export prices, local market prices, expert opinion and departmental valuation. On the record, the exporter did not effectively challenge that evidence or seek cross-examination, and the surrounding circumstances supported mens rea. Misdeclaration and undervaluation were therefore established, and confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72282</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>