<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (9) TMI 217 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72255</link>
    <description>Under the self-removal procedure, limitation for a refund claim under Rule 11 runs from the date duty is debited in the Personal Ledger Account on self-assessment, not from the later RT 12 assessment by the proper officer. The later RT 12 scrutiny under Rule 173I is only an arithmetical check on the assessee&#039;s self-determined liability; it does not shift the limitation date for the duty already paid. If that later assessment reveals a deficiency, the additional duty arising on adjustment may have its own relevant date. Authorities based on provisional assessment or a different statutory setting were distinguished.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 10:54:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (9) TMI 217 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72255</link>
      <description>Under the self-removal procedure, limitation for a refund claim under Rule 11 runs from the date duty is debited in the Personal Ledger Account on self-assessment, not from the later RT 12 assessment by the proper officer. The later RT 12 scrutiny under Rule 173I is only an arithmetical check on the assessee&#039;s self-determined liability; it does not shift the limitation date for the duty already paid. If that later assessment reveals a deficiency, the additional duty arising on adjustment may have its own relevant date. Authorities based on provisional assessment or a different statutory setting were distinguished.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>