<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 186 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72203</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment of duty under Heading No. 90.29 for the goods in question, dismissing the appeal. The decision was based on the classification criteria outlined in Chapter Note 2(a) of Chapter 90, emphasizing the suitability of the goods as parts or accessories for the particle size analyzer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 12:15:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 186 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72203</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment of duty under Heading No. 90.29 for the goods in question, dismissing the appeal. The decision was based on the classification criteria outlined in Chapter Note 2(a) of Chapter 90, emphasizing the suitability of the goods as parts or accessories for the particle size analyzer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72203</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>