https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72195 The Tribunal determined that the Step and Repeat Machine should be classified under Heading 84.40, not Heading 84.34 or 90.10. The classification and concession eligibility for the Screen Copying Installation under Heading 90.10 were upheld, as well as the concession eligibility for the Automatic Danagraf Camera under Heading 90.07. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decisions of the Appellate Collector regarding the concessions under Notification No. 112/77. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 May 2011 11:47:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72195 The Tribunal determined that the Step and Repeat Machine should be classified under Heading 84.40, not Heading 84.34 or 90.10. The classification and concession eligibility for the Screen Copying Installation under Heading 90.10 were upheld, as well as the concession eligibility for the Automatic Danagraf Camera under Heading 90.07. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decisions of the Appellate Collector regarding the concessions under Notification No. 112/77. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 11 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72195