<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 230 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72187</link>
    <description>Imported transformer board strips used as insulation components for power transformers were held classifiable under the specific tariff heading for insulating fittings, not under the heading for transformers. The Tribunal found that the goods were specially designed as spacers between high- and low-voltage coils, and that insulation was their principal function while spacing and mechanical support were only incidental. It treated the relevant Explanatory Note as persuasive but not controlling, and applied Note 2 to Section XVI of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 to give precedence to the specific heading for the parts themselves over the heading for the machine or equipment of which they form a part. The lower authorities&#039; classification was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 11:09:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 230 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72187</link>
      <description>Imported transformer board strips used as insulation components for power transformers were held classifiable under the specific tariff heading for insulating fittings, not under the heading for transformers. The Tribunal found that the goods were specially designed as spacers between high- and low-voltage coils, and that insulation was their principal function while spacing and mechanical support were only incidental. It treated the relevant Explanatory Note as persuasive but not controlling, and applied Note 2 to Section XVI of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 to give precedence to the specific heading for the parts themselves over the heading for the machine or equipment of which they form a part. The lower authorities&#039; classification was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>