<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (10) TMI 194 - BEFORE THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72156</link>
    <description>The case involved a dispute over the inclusion of demurrage charges in the assessable value for customs duty assessment. The Collector of Customs (Appeals) demanded additional duty based on demurrage charges, considering them part of freight charges. The appellants argued that demurrage charges, incurred due to exceptional circumstances, should not be part of the assessable value under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment concluded that demurrage charges, related to the time charter of the vessel and not equivalent to freight charges, should not be added to the assessable value. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 16:46:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (10) TMI 194 - BEFORE THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPEALS), BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72156</link>
      <description>The case involved a dispute over the inclusion of demurrage charges in the assessable value for customs duty assessment. The Collector of Customs (Appeals) demanded additional duty based on demurrage charges, considering them part of freight charges. The appellants argued that demurrage charges, incurred due to exceptional circumstances, should not be part of the assessable value under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment concluded that demurrage charges, related to the time charter of the vessel and not equivalent to freight charges, should not be added to the assessable value. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>