<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (9) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72152</link>
    <description>The appeals did not raise any question on the rate of duty, assessable value, classification, or any connected issue for assessment. As the impugned orders did not determine such matters, the Special Bench jurisdiction was not attracted. The appeals were therefore treated as outside the jurisdiction of Special Bench &#039;C&#039;, and the departmental objection succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 16:29:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (9) TMI 211 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72152</link>
      <description>The appeals did not raise any question on the rate of duty, assessable value, classification, or any connected issue for assessment. As the impugned orders did not determine such matters, the Special Bench jurisdiction was not attracted. The appeals were therefore treated as outside the jurisdiction of Special Bench &#039;C&#039;, and the departmental objection succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>