https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72126 Proviso (f) to Rule 2(f) of the Gold Control (Licensing of Dealers) Rules, 1969 was construed as requiring continuous employment for not less than five years in the shop of a single licensed dealer, followed by an application within sixty days of leaving that employment. The five-year condition was held to be tied to one establishment and could not be satisfied by aggregating service under different dealers or by counting periods broken by service changes. On that construction, the applicant's employment history did not meet the statutory requirement, and the licence claim failed. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72126 Proviso (f) to Rule 2(f) of the Gold Control (Licensing of Dealers) Rules, 1969 was construed as requiring continuous employment for not less than five years in the shop of a single licensed dealer, followed by an application within sixty days of leaving that employment. The five-year condition was held to be tied to one establishment and could not be satisfied by aggregating service under different dealers or by counting periods broken by service changes. On that construction, the applicant's employment history did not meet the statutory requirement, and the licence claim failed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72126