https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72121 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, an established importer of arms and ammunition, in a challenge against orders by the Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports and Chief Controller of Imports and Exports regarding quota licences. The court found that the authorities' deduction of 25% from the petitioner's entitlement was unjustified, as the reliance on certain policy provisions was erroneous. The court directed the respondents to issue the full quota licence without any reduction as per the Import Policy of 1977-78, resulting in a successful outcome for the petitioner without costs awarded. en-us Tue, 20 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 May 2011 12:48:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72121 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, an established importer of arms and ammunition, in a challenge against orders by the Joint Chief Controller of Imports and Exports and Chief Controller of Imports and Exports regarding quota licences. The court found that the authorities' deduction of 25% from the petitioner's entitlement was unjustified, as the reliance on certain policy provisions was erroneous. The court directed the respondents to issue the full quota licence without any reduction as per the Import Policy of 1977-78, resulting in a successful outcome for the petitioner without costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72121