<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 157 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72065</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of withdrawal notifications dated 28th February, 1982, regarding Customs duty exemptions on melting scrap of stainless steel and aluminium ingots. It ruled that the government&#039;s actions were justified in the public interest, emphasizing legislative powers to impose or withdraw exemptions. The court rejected the application of promissory estoppel against legislative actions, stating that public interest can override promises. Additionally, it held that restrictions on trade rights under Article 19(1)(g) were reasonable in the context of economic policy and public interest. The petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 157 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72065</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of withdrawal notifications dated 28th February, 1982, regarding Customs duty exemptions on melting scrap of stainless steel and aluminium ingots. It ruled that the government&#039;s actions were justified in the public interest, emphasizing legislative powers to impose or withdraw exemptions. The court rejected the application of promissory estoppel against legislative actions, stating that public interest can override promises. Additionally, it held that restrictions on trade rights under Article 19(1)(g) were reasonable in the context of economic policy and public interest. The petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>