<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 542 - ITAT BILASPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72057</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 due to lack of proper opportunity given to the assessee and failure to follow the legal requirements. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed as the Commissioner did not verify service of notice, rushed the order without adequate opportunity, and the Assessing Officer had already determined no penalty was applicable based on relevant case law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 542 - ITAT BILASPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72057</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s order under section 263 due to lack of proper opportunity given to the assessee and failure to follow the legal requirements. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed as the Commissioner did not verify service of notice, rushed the order without adequate opportunity, and the Assessing Officer had already determined no penalty was applicable based on relevant case law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>