<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 279 - ITAT BANGALORE-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72051</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the amounts received by the assessee were not loans or deposits, thus not violating Section 269T of the IT Act. As a result, the penalty imposed under Section 271E was canceled, amounting to Rs. 14.72 crores. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the Tribunal also noted the lack of justification for the penalty related to another entity, M/s Adarsh Enterprise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 11:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 279 - ITAT BANGALORE-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72051</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the amounts received by the assessee were not loans or deposits, thus not violating Section 269T of the IT Act. As a result, the penalty imposed under Section 271E was canceled, amounting to Rs. 14.72 crores. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the Tribunal also noted the lack of justification for the penalty related to another entity, M/s Adarsh Enterprise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72051</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>