<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 536 - ITAT BANGALORE-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72044</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling in favor of the assessees on the long-term capital gains matter and remanding the interest expenditure claim issue to the AO for further review. The decision stressed the importance of thorough verification and compliance with the Income Tax Act provisions when calculating capital gains and permissible deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 536 - ITAT BANGALORE-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72044</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, ruling in favor of the assessees on the long-term capital gains matter and remanding the interest expenditure claim issue to the AO for further review. The decision stressed the importance of thorough verification and compliance with the Income Tax Act provisions when calculating capital gains and permissible deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>