<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 407 - ITAT BANGALORE-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, recognizing that the assessee held full legal ownership of shares in a phased manner, affecting the classification of capital gains as short-term or long-term. The Tribunal concluded that the profit arising from 30% of shares held for less than 12 months was short-term, while the profit from other shares was considered long-term.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 407 - ITAT BANGALORE-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, recognizing that the assessee held full legal ownership of shares in a phased manner, affecting the classification of capital gains as short-term or long-term. The Tribunal concluded that the profit arising from 30% of shares held for less than 12 months was short-term, while the profit from other shares was considered long-term.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>