<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 356 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72011</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It upheld the disallowance of the loss claimed from the subsidiary company and the disallowance of carrying forward the capital loss. However, it confirmed the deletion of disallowance of car and foreign traveling expenses by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 356 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72011</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It upheld the disallowance of the loss claimed from the subsidiary company and the disallowance of carrying forward the capital loss. However, it confirmed the deletion of disallowance of car and foreign traveling expenses by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=72011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>