https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71997 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal regarding the deletion of the addition of Rs. 20,12,580 by CIT(A) related to bad debts claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee did not comply with the provisions of Section 36(1)(vii) for most of the bad debts claimed, except for Rs. 30,587.85. The Tribunal sustained the addition of Rs. 34,060 by CIT(A) and dismissed the cross-objection of the assessee as infructuous. en-us Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 01 Aug 2012 18:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71997 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal regarding the deletion of the addition of Rs. 20,12,580 by CIT(A) related to bad debts claimed by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee did not comply with the provisions of Section 36(1)(vii) for most of the bad debts claimed, except for Rs. 30,587.85. The Tribunal sustained the addition of Rs. 34,060 by CIT(A) and dismissed the cross-objection of the assessee as infructuous. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71997