<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 525 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-D</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71973</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee on the jurisdictional issue and against the Revenue. The reassessment notice issued beyond four years was deemed invalid as it was considered a mere change of opinion without any failure to disclose material facts. Therefore, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment, declaring it legally deficient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Apr 2016 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110275" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 525 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-D</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71973</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling in favor of the assessee on the jurisdictional issue and against the Revenue. The reassessment notice issued beyond four years was deemed invalid as it was considered a mere change of opinion without any failure to disclose material facts. Therefore, the Tribunal quashed the reassessment, declaring it legally deficient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>