<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 270 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71968</link>
    <description>The Tribunal annulled the orders passed by the CIT under s. 263, holding them illegal as the CIT&#039;s action was deemed a change of opinion, not permissible under s. 263. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO had considered the merits before dropping reassessment proceedings, and the deduction u/s 80-IA(9) was allowable based on a valid interpretation of the law. Consequently, the appeals filed by the assessee in both assessment years were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 23:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 270 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-C</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71968</link>
      <description>The Tribunal annulled the orders passed by the CIT under s. 263, holding them illegal as the CIT&#039;s action was deemed a change of opinion, not permissible under s. 263. The Tribunal emphasized that the AO had considered the merits before dropping reassessment proceedings, and the deduction u/s 80-IA(9) was allowable based on a valid interpretation of the law. Consequently, the appeals filed by the assessee in both assessment years were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>