<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 522 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71960</link>
    <description>The ITAT quashed the revision order passed by the CIT under Section 263, holding that the assessment order by the Assessing Officer was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The ITAT allowed the appeals, confirming the admissibility of the bad debt claim and the company&#039;s compliance with the Companies Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:28:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 522 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71960</link>
      <description>The ITAT quashed the revision order passed by the CIT under Section 263, holding that the assessment order by the Assessing Officer was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue. The ITAT allowed the appeals, confirming the admissibility of the bad debt claim and the company&#039;s compliance with the Companies Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>