<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 297 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71958</link>
    <description>The case involved issues of decline in gross profit rate, maintenance of stock register, lump sum addition of Rs. 6 lakhs, appeal against agreed addition, and verification of agreement to addition. The Third Member ordered to remand the case to the CIT(A) for verification of whether the assessee agreed to the addition of Rs. 6 lakhs. The CIT(A) was directed to re-adjudicate the addition based on this verification, ensuring both parties are given an opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:21:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 297 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71958</link>
      <description>The case involved issues of decline in gross profit rate, maintenance of stock register, lump sum addition of Rs. 6 lakhs, appeal against agreed addition, and verification of agreement to addition. The Third Member ordered to remand the case to the CIT(A) for verification of whether the assessee agreed to the addition of Rs. 6 lakhs. The CIT(A) was directed to re-adjudicate the addition based on this verification, ensuring both parties are given an opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>