<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 399 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71947</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of penalties under section 271(1)(c) for two assessees. Emphasizing the assessees&#039; genuine beliefs, voluntary disclosures, and lack of intentional income concealment, the judgment highlighted the significance of these factors in penalty determinations for tax offenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 12:37:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 399 - ITAT AHMEDABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71947</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of penalties under section 271(1)(c) for two assessees. Emphasizing the assessees&#039; genuine beliefs, voluntary disclosures, and lack of intentional income concealment, the judgment highlighted the significance of these factors in penalty determinations for tax offenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>