<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 483 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71940</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad, in a judgment on July 31, 2008, ruled on the classification of land under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and treatment of undisclosed income. The ITAT found the land transferred to a firm to be agricultural, not a capital asset, reversing lower authorities&#039; decisions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal on unexplained investments and expenses was dismissed due to the tax effect being less than Rs. 2 lakhs, following CBDT Circular and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 483 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71940</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad, in a judgment on July 31, 2008, ruled on the classification of land under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and treatment of undisclosed income. The ITAT found the land transferred to a firm to be agricultural, not a capital asset, reversing lower authorities&#039; decisions. The Revenue&#039;s appeal on unexplained investments and expenses was dismissed due to the tax effect being less than Rs. 2 lakhs, following CBDT Circular and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71940</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>