https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71936 The Tribunal remitted various issues back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination due to procedural violations and lack of adequate evidence. The Third Member confirmed the addition for under-valuation of shares in one company but remitted the issue of another company back for verification. The assessee's cross objection and revenue's appeal for one assessment year were allowed for statistical purposes, while the revenue's appeal for another year was partly allowed. en-us Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71936 The Tribunal remitted various issues back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination due to procedural violations and lack of adequate evidence. The Third Member confirmed the addition for under-valuation of shares in one company but remitted the issue of another company back for verification. The assessee's cross objection and revenue's appeal for one assessment year were allowed for statistical purposes, while the revenue's appeal for another year was partly allowed. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71936