<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 316 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reassessment order dated 27-1-2004, allowing the deduction under section 80-IA. The CIT&#039;s action under section 263 to withdraw the deduction was deemed unjustified as the Assessing Officer had adequately considered the manufacturing activities of the assessee. The Tribunal found the reassessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue, setting aside the CIT&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2016 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 316 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reassessment order dated 27-1-2004, allowing the deduction under section 80-IA. The CIT&#039;s action under section 263 to withdraw the deduction was deemed unjustified as the Assessing Officer had adequately considered the manufacturing activities of the assessee. The Tribunal found the reassessment order was not erroneous or prejudicial to revenue, setting aside the CIT&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>