<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 339 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and allowed the assessee&#039;s rectification application under section 154, holding that the original assessment order existed despite a notice under section 148. The Tribunal emphasized that the term &quot;mistake&quot; under section 154 encompasses errors discovered after a thorough examination of the record. The Tribunal concluded that the rectification application was justified, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed premature the CIT(A)&#039;s finding on the validity of proceedings under section 147, deleting those portions of the order. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was not unanimous, with the Third Member concurring with the Judicial Member, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:08:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 339 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and allowed the assessee&#039;s rectification application under section 154, holding that the original assessment order existed despite a notice under section 148. The Tribunal emphasized that the term &quot;mistake&quot; under section 154 encompasses errors discovered after a thorough examination of the record. The Tribunal concluded that the rectification application was justified, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. Additionally, the Tribunal deemed premature the CIT(A)&#039;s finding on the validity of proceedings under section 147, deleting those portions of the order. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was not unanimous, with the Third Member concurring with the Judicial Member, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>