<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 188 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside various issues to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after proper verification and providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard. It emphasized considering the belated return filed by the assessee and directed the AO to follow due procedure and principles of natural justice in reassessing income and related matters. The Tribunal&#039;s decision focused on ensuring a fair and thorough reassessment process for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 188 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside various issues to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after proper verification and providing the assessee an opportunity to be heard. It emphasized considering the belated return filed by the assessee and directed the AO to follow due procedure and principles of natural justice in reassessing income and related matters. The Tribunal&#039;s decision focused on ensuring a fair and thorough reassessment process for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>