<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 395 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71861</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income declared for the assessment year should not be treated as undisclosed income under Section 158BB(1)(c) of the IT Act. Consequently, the penalty under Section 158BFA(2) was deemed unjustified and cancelled. The direction by the CIT(A) to charge interest under Section 158BFA(1) was quashed as it exceeded jurisdiction and was not supported by proper reasoning.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:19:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 395 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71861</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the income declared for the assessment year should not be treated as undisclosed income under Section 158BB(1)(c) of the IT Act. Consequently, the penalty under Section 158BFA(2) was deemed unjustified and cancelled. The direction by the CIT(A) to charge interest under Section 158BFA(1) was quashed as it exceeded jurisdiction and was not supported by proper reasoning.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>