<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 206 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71856</link>
    <description>The ITAT concluded that the proviso to s. 113 of the IT Act, which imposes a surcharge on undisclosed income, is not retrospective and applies prospectively from 1st June 2002. As the search in this case occurred before this date, the surcharge was deemed unlawful. The assessee&#039;s appeal was accepted, and the surcharge was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 206 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71856</link>
      <description>The ITAT concluded that the proviso to s. 113 of the IT Act, which imposes a surcharge on undisclosed income, is not retrospective and applies prospectively from 1st June 2002. As the search in this case occurred before this date, the surcharge was deemed unlawful. The assessee&#039;s appeal was accepted, and the surcharge was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>