<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (4) TMI 172 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71823</link>
    <description>The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanations regarding the funds collected by the building fund committee of Gurudwara Gurusing Sabha, the unexplained deposit by the assessee&#039;s daughter, and the deposits by two friends. Despite dissent, the majority found the explanations reasonable, supported by evidence such as affidavits, confirmations, and financial positions. The Tribunal deleted the additions of Rs. 1,10,000, Rs. 25,000, and Rs. 30,000, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:44:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (4) TMI 172 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71823</link>
      <description>The Tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s explanations regarding the funds collected by the building fund committee of Gurudwara Gurusing Sabha, the unexplained deposit by the assessee&#039;s daughter, and the deposits by two friends. Despite dissent, the majority found the explanations reasonable, supported by evidence such as affidavits, confirmations, and financial positions. The Tribunal deleted the additions of Rs. 1,10,000, Rs. 25,000, and Rs. 30,000, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>