<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 194 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71819</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of certain additions and confirming others. It held that the amounts noted on the piece of paper represented borrowings used to acquire assets, not advances due. The Tribunal emphasized avoiding double taxation and instructed the Assessing Officer to consider the explanations provided by the assessee judiciously.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:13:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 194 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71819</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the deletion of certain additions and confirming others. It held that the amounts noted on the piece of paper represented borrowings used to acquire assets, not advances due. The Tribunal emphasized avoiding double taxation and instructed the Assessing Officer to consider the explanations provided by the assessee judiciously.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>