<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 147 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71815</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to additional depreciation and investment allowance on specified vehicles used for construction work. It concluded that the vehicles were not road transport vehicles but were used exclusively at the work site, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, emphasizing the functional test and legal principles to support the allowance of benefits to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 12:05:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 147 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71815</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to additional depreciation and investment allowance on specified vehicles used for construction work. It concluded that the vehicles were not road transport vehicles but were used exclusively at the work site, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, emphasizing the functional test and legal principles to support the allowance of benefits to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71815</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>