<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 187 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71803</link>
    <description>The Tribunal annulled the order of acquisition under Section 269F(6) as the acquisition proceedings were initiated beyond the prescribed time limit, lacked material evidence for initiation, had defective notices, and did not establish that the fair market value exceeded the apparent consideration by the required margin. The appeals were allowed based on these grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:42:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 187 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71803</link>
      <description>The Tribunal annulled the order of acquisition under Section 269F(6) as the acquisition proceedings were initiated beyond the prescribed time limit, lacked material evidence for initiation, had defective notices, and did not establish that the fair market value exceeded the apparent consideration by the required margin. The appeals were allowed based on these grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>