<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 160 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found procedural lapses by the ITO in a partnership firm registration case. It highlighted failures in passing a specific order, lack of proper inquiry into genuineness, and denying the firm an opportunity to be heard. Emphasizing mutual promises and sharing of losses as valid consideration, the Tribunal set aside the AAC&#039;s decision and remanded the matter to the ITO for reevaluation. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 160 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found procedural lapses by the ITO in a partnership firm registration case. It highlighted failures in passing a specific order, lack of proper inquiry into genuineness, and denying the firm an opportunity to be heard. Emphasizing mutual promises and sharing of losses as valid consideration, the Tribunal set aside the AAC&#039;s decision and remanded the matter to the ITO for reevaluation. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>