<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 170 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71800</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision for two separate assessments. It determined that the firm was reconstituted rather than dissolved, emphasizing that the incomes of the two periods should not be combined for taxation purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling aligned with statutory provisions and judicial precedents to ensure equitable taxation treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:37:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 170 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71800</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision for two separate assessments. It determined that the firm was reconstituted rather than dissolved, emphasizing that the incomes of the two periods should not be combined for taxation purposes. The Tribunal&#039;s ruling aligned with statutory provisions and judicial precedents to ensure equitable taxation treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>