<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (7) TMI 197 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71774</link>
    <description>A partnership that had first become a proprietary concern of one partner and later reconstituted as a fresh partnership was treated as a succession, not a mere change in constitution. On the partnership deed and dissolution deed, the earlier firm was held to have come to an end, so the conditions for applying section 187 of the Income-tax Act were not met. The assessment therefore proceeded on the basis of succession under section 188, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:07:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (7) TMI 197 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71774</link>
      <description>A partnership that had first become a proprietary concern of one partner and later reconstituted as a fresh partnership was treated as a succession, not a mere change in constitution. On the partnership deed and dissolution deed, the earlier firm was held to have come to an end, so the conditions for applying section 187 of the Income-tax Act were not met. The assessment therefore proceeded on the basis of succession under section 188, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>