<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 148 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71773</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the refusal of registration to the assessee firm under s. 185(1)(b) of the IT Act, 1961. The partnership deed did not accurately reflect the status of a minor partner, leading to discrepancies and the denial of registration. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments and citation of case laws, the tribunal found the deed lacking in evidence of the minor partner&#039;s position, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The stay petition was considered moot as the appeal was decided on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:06:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 148 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71773</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the refusal of registration to the assessee firm under s. 185(1)(b) of the IT Act, 1961. The partnership deed did not accurately reflect the status of a minor partner, leading to discrepancies and the denial of registration. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments and citation of case laws, the tribunal found the deed lacking in evidence of the minor partner&#039;s position, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. The stay petition was considered moot as the appeal was decided on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>