<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 186 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71754</link>
    <description>Life insurance proceeds paid on a policy funded from Hindu undivided family assets, reflected in the family books, were treated as belonging to the family rather than the deceased&#039;s individual estate despite nomination of the wife. On that basis, the proceeds were excluded from the estate duty computation. The share of lineal descendants was then not aggregated for rate purposes under section 34(1)(c) because, after exclusion of the insurance amount, the deceased&#039;s estate fell below the taxable limit and the aggregation provision had no operative effect on the facts found. The revenue&#039;s additions were therefore not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:23:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 186 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71754</link>
      <description>Life insurance proceeds paid on a policy funded from Hindu undivided family assets, reflected in the family books, were treated as belonging to the family rather than the deceased&#039;s individual estate despite nomination of the wife. On that basis, the proceeds were excluded from the estate duty computation. The share of lineal descendants was then not aggregated for rate purposes under section 34(1)(c) because, after exclusion of the insurance amount, the deceased&#039;s estate fell below the taxable limit and the aggregation provision had no operative effect on the facts found. The revenue&#039;s additions were therefore not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>