<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (9) TMI 182 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71749</link>
    <description>Interest on overdraft funds used to advance money to a partner&#039;s daughter for purchase of a flat lacked the necessary business nexus, because the borrowing was diverted away from the assessee-firm&#039;s business. The interest attributable to that non-business advance was therefore not deductible as business expenditure, and disallowance of proportionate interest was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (9) TMI 182 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71749</link>
      <description>Interest on overdraft funds used to advance money to a partner&#039;s daughter for purchase of a flat lacked the necessary business nexus, because the borrowing was diverted away from the assessee-firm&#039;s business. The interest attributable to that non-business advance was therefore not deductible as business expenditure, and disallowance of proportionate interest was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71749</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>