<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 193 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71739</link>
    <description>The case involved a debate on whether the inclusion of a deceased partner&#039;s wife as a new partner constituted a dissolution of the original firm or a change in its constitution. The Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC) ruled in favor of treating it as a case of succession, leading to separate assessments for the periods before and after the partner&#039;s death. The Tribunal supported this decision, emphasizing the formation of a new firm with separate accounts indicated succession, warranting separate assessments. The departmental appeal was dismissed, affirming the AAC&#039;s decision in favor of treating the situation as a case of succession.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:54:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110061" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 193 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71739</link>
      <description>The case involved a debate on whether the inclusion of a deceased partner&#039;s wife as a new partner constituted a dissolution of the original firm or a change in its constitution. The Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC) ruled in favor of treating it as a case of succession, leading to separate assessments for the periods before and after the partner&#039;s death. The Tribunal supported this decision, emphasizing the formation of a new firm with separate accounts indicated succession, warranting separate assessments. The departmental appeal was dismissed, affirming the AAC&#039;s decision in favor of treating the situation as a case of succession.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>