<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 175 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71736</link>
    <description>A small room used for business discussions, negotiations and incidental hospitality with visiting business principals was not a guest house in the true sense. Expenditure on the premises was incurred wholly for business purposes and business exigency, so it did not fall within the disallowance for guest house expenses. The amount was therefore allowable as a business deduction under section 37(1), and the disallowance was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:50:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 175 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71736</link>
      <description>A small room used for business discussions, negotiations and incidental hospitality with visiting business principals was not a guest house in the true sense. Expenditure on the premises was incurred wholly for business purposes and business exigency, so it did not fall within the disallowance for guest house expenses. The amount was therefore allowable as a business deduction under section 37(1), and the disallowance was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>