https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71693 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deleting additions such as amounts received by the appellant's children as customary gifts, unexplained investments in agricultural lands, alleged on-money payment, gifts received from an NRI, and double additions for declared income and suppression of sales. However, the Tribunal sustained additions for the difference between declared and disclosed income, based on lack of evidence linking undisclosed income to agricultural sources. en-us Fri, 17 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:28:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71693 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, deleting additions such as amounts received by the appellant's children as customary gifts, unexplained investments in agricultural lands, alleged on-money payment, gifts received from an NRI, and double additions for declared income and suppression of sales. However, the Tribunal sustained additions for the difference between declared and disclosed income, based on lack of evidence linking undisclosed income to agricultural sources. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 17 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71693