<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 90 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that additional tax under s. 143(1A) cannot be imposed when the total income remains the same after adjustments. Despite an increase in income declared, as the total income remained &#039;Nil,&#039; the second condition for levying additional tax was not met. Therefore, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and canceling the additional tax imposed by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:15:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110011" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 90 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that additional tax under s. 143(1A) cannot be imposed when the total income remains the same after adjustments. Despite an increase in income declared, as the total income remained &#039;Nil,&#039; the second condition for levying additional tax was not met. Therefore, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and canceling the additional tax imposed by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>