https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71687 The ITAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the orders of the authorities below. The ITAT found that the order under section 35 was not in violation of natural justice as due notice was provided. Additionally, the order signed by the Assessing Officer under a different designation was deemed valid under section 42C of the Wealth-tax Act. The adoption of the value of equity shares by the Assessing Officer was upheld as justified under the Act and relevant legal provisions. en-us Mon, 17 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2011 16:11:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71687 The ITAT dismissed the appeal, upholding the orders of the authorities below. The ITAT found that the order under section 35 was not in violation of natural justice as due notice was provided. Additionally, the order signed by the Assessing Officer under a different designation was deemed valid under section 42C of the Wealth-tax Act. The adoption of the value of equity shares by the Assessing Officer was upheld as justified under the Act and relevant legal provisions. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Mon, 17 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71687