<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 382 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty order issued by the Addl. CIT was time-barred as it was passed beyond the prescribed six-month period. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 2,70,000 imposed under section 271D was canceled. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the penalty justification or the reasonable cause for the default under section 269SS. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:59:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=110006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 382 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty order issued by the Addl. CIT was time-barred as it was passed beyond the prescribed six-month period. Consequently, the penalty of Rs. 2,70,000 imposed under section 271D was canceled. The Tribunal did not address the merits of the penalty justification or the reasonable cause for the default under section 269SS. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>