<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 319 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71659</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in part. The issue of computation of deduction under section 80-IA was restored to the Assessing Officer. The ground regarding the valuation of closing stock was dismissed as it was not pressed. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in charging interest under section 234B without specific mention in the assessment order. The additional grounds raised by the assessee were admitted and succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:33:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 319 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71659</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in part. The issue of computation of deduction under section 80-IA was restored to the Assessing Officer. The ground regarding the valuation of closing stock was dismissed as it was not pressed. The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer was not justified in charging interest under section 234B without specific mention in the assessment order. The additional grounds raised by the assessee were admitted and succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>