<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (4) TMI 206 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71650</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting both additions made under section 143(1)(a) for provisions of retirement benefits and leave encashment, and the amount received in settlement of the dispute with AEGAIK Germany. The Tribunal emphasized that prima facie adjustments should not cover debatable issues requiring detailed examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:02:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (4) TMI 206 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71650</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, deleting both additions made under section 143(1)(a) for provisions of retirement benefits and leave encashment, and the amount received in settlement of the dispute with AEGAIK Germany. The Tribunal emphasized that prima facie adjustments should not cover debatable issues requiring detailed examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>