<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (6) TMI 96 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee. The Tribunal concluded that the new method of accounting adopted by the assessee for machinery spares did not enable the ITO to deduce true income, and thus, the provisions of Section 145 were applicable. The Tribunal also noted that the Commissioner had not closed the door for the assessee to furnish proper proof before the ITO in the fresh assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 12:58:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (6) TMI 96 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order under Section 263, dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee. The Tribunal concluded that the new method of accounting adopted by the assessee for machinery spares did not enable the ITO to deduce true income, and thus, the provisions of Section 145 were applicable. The Tribunal also noted that the Commissioner had not closed the door for the assessee to furnish proper proof before the ITO in the fresh assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>