<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 313 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71623</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to prove the existence of an Association of Persons (A.O.P.) as there was no common purpose or joint enterprise to produce income. The Tribunal found the notice issued to the alleged A.O.P. invalid, rendering the assessment void ab initio. The Tribunal concluded that the AO wrongly assumed jurisdiction, leading to the quashing of the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:27:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=109945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 313 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71623</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to prove the existence of an Association of Persons (A.O.P.) as there was no common purpose or joint enterprise to produce income. The Tribunal found the notice issued to the alleged A.O.P. invalid, rendering the assessment void ab initio. The Tribunal concluded that the AO wrongly assumed jurisdiction, leading to the quashing of the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=71623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>